All workpackage deliverables
are listed on the left-hand side. Documents without links represent documents
and services not yet due for delivery.
Workpackage
Name |
Description |
|
1. Project Management |
|
|
The objectives of this workpackage are to deliver the objectives of
the ANGEL Project according to the timescale and budget agreed with
the IE Programme Office, as amended during the life of the project
by the Project Board and to act as the primary channel of communication
between ANGEL and the IE Programme Office, the JCAS Sparta working
group, and other relevant national agencies and parallel projects.
|
|
- 1st report
to DNER - D1.2 |
|
- 2nd
report to DNER - D1.3 |
|
- 3rd report
to DNER - D1.4 |
|
- 4th report to DNER - D1.5 |
|
- Conclusive report - D1.6 |
| 2.
Initial Formative Evaluation |
|
|
- Methodology - D2.1 |
This workpackage
forms the initial research and formative evaluation for the ANGEL
project. The research undertaken will take into consideration the
range of different potential users of the ANGEL service, including
staff and students at all levels across a variety of subject domains.
By applying appropriate user needs analysis methods, a viable sample
of user issues can be identified. |
|
- Interview script |
|
- Recommendations |
|
- Final report - D2.2 |
|
3. - Dissemination and Monitoring |
|
|
|
This
workpackage will explore issues and technologies of interest to
a wide community including academics, librarians, and IT managers,
as well as standards organisations and other projects. Tasks will
include an initial state of the art study and literature review,
maintenance of a technology watch, and various dissemination activities.
|
|
- Technology watch -
D3.2 |
|
- Newsletter
- D3.4a |
|
- Information
Pack - D3.4b |
|
- ANGEL demonstrators - D3.5 |
| 4.
ANGEL Conceptual Design |
|
| |
Following the
findings of formative evaluation work, the conceptual design for the
ANGEL system will be developed. It will take into account issues of
user accessibility (including accessibility for users with differing
sensory and motor abilities) and standards and protocols for integration
of relevant resources. The focus will be on "resource discovery" (metadata,
searching and browsing), "access" (full and part-content delivery)
and navigation (support and tracking). The identification, understanding
and support for standards for the integration of existing metadata
(regarding users, systems and learning resources). |
|
- Internal
messaging specification - D4.2 |
|
5. Development of ANGEL System |
|
|
|
The
development of original software by ANGEL will follow the conceptual
model (Deliverable 4.1) produced in Workpackage 4.
Components will interoperate using the internal protocols
defined in Deliverable 4.2. Service
modules will be produced in at least two prototype versions for
testing and feedback, with a final release package (including all
necessary documentation) that should be capable of implementation by
an appropriately equipped HE or FE institution that has had no
previous connection with the ANGEL project. |
|
- Angel
prototype - D5.2 |
|
- Angel
server - D5.3 |
|
- Angel
documentation - D5.4 |
| 6. Authentication and
Authorisation |
|
| |
The ANGEL server to be developed
in Workpackage 5 will provide a comprehensive range of online
middleware services to support authentication of end-users,
collation of 'user metadata' from institutional directory sources to
establish the roles and rights of end-users based on group
memberships, and the transparent authorisation of end-users to
access those information and learning resources for which they have
access rights. The purpose of Workpackage 6 is
to implement and test interoperability and compatibility with
national and global models and systems for Ac&As, including (but
not necessarily limited to, if possible) PAPI and Shibboleth.
Workpackage 6 will also document policy guidelines for the
implementation and operation of future Ac&As services by JISC on
a national scale.
|
|
- PAPI and Shibboleth demonstrators - D6.2 |
|
- PAPI and Shibboleth reports - D6.3 |
|
- Report for Sparta on AA developments - D6.4 |
|
- Namespace report - D6.5 |
| 7. Evaluate
System and Use |
|
| |
This workpackage
will constitute the main summative evaluation of the project. SBU
will take no direct role in the design and systems development elements
of ANGEL (apart from ongoing evaluation, dissemination and monitoring
as described in WP3), and will act as 'arms length' evaluators of
the working deliverables produced by other partners. Evaluation criteria
would be likely to include ease of installation, user interface design,
functionality, documentation / help, ease of use, speed of response
etc. Adherence to broad design principles such as use of open standards,
support for collaboration, support for audit etc. will also be evaluated. |