Authenticated Networked Guided Environment for Learning
homepage | documents | what's new | technology watch | dissemination | contacts

html document 009

ANGEL Project semi-annual report to DNER

Author: John Paschoud

 

Title of project:

ANGEL

Award no:

JILT/ANGEL (B4/B43)

Project Manager:

John Paschoud

Project Team:

London School of Economics, University of Edinburgh, South Bank University, De Montfort University, Sheffield Hallam University, EDINA

Duration of Award:

Sep-2000

Feb-2003

Period of Report:

Feb-2001

Jul-2001

Lead Institution:

London School of Economics

Total amount:

£ 378,997

Total co-funding:

£ 200,807


Aims, Objectives and Methodology
Confirmation Statement
Highlights, Outcomes and Important Findings from Project
Changes to the Original Award
Project Staff
Involvement with Programme
Publications and Publicity
Engagement with Potential Outcome Users
Detailed Progress and Future Plans
Finanicial Summary Table

Aims, Objectives and Methodology

  • To develop and implement institutional Guided Environments for Learning
  • To develop and implement a model for a national networked Authentication & Authorisation infrastructure

A significant change to our methodology will be the de-emphasis on creation of end-user interfaces by ANGEL directly, because these risk merely ‘competing’ with many institutional and commercial portal and MLE developments. Instead, ANGEL will deliver the same aims and objectives by focussing more clearly on the creation of middleware to provide services and standards-compliant interfaces for use by a wide range of user front-ends. This is elaborated in ANGEL Deliverable 4.1

Authentication & Authorisation development will follow the model of PAPI but will also attempt to be inter-operable with Shibboleth, and propose a transitional method of inter-operation with Athens.

Confirmation Statement

I confirm that the project development is being conducted under the terms agreed in the initial contract with JISC, subject to any amendments notified to and agreed with JISC and/or the DNER Programme Office.

Highlights , Outcomes and Important Findings from project

Workpackage 2 completed, with key recommendations published and fed into Workpackages 4 and 5. Workpackage 4 completed. Workpackages 5 and 6 in progress, but initial deliverables from these are delayed. Workpackage 3 in progress on schedule.

All project deliverables and related public documents are available via: http://www.angel.ac.uk/documents/documents.html

Changes to the Original Award

Deliverable due (within this period)

Month due

Month delivered

Status / Comment

D2.1

7

8

 

D2.2

8

8

 

D3.1

9

9

 

D3.2

11

11

 

D4.1

9

11

Delayed due to extended consideration of viable design, now agreed

D4.2

10

11

D5.1

11

(13)

Dependent on D4.1; Expected m13

D6.1

9

(13)

Delayed due to extended negotiation with JCAS; Expected m13

Project Staff

Post

Based

Name & email (or post status)

Project Co-director

LSE

* Maureen Wade <m.wade@lse.ac.uk>

Project Co-director

UED

* John MacColl <john.maccoll@ed.ac.uk>

Project Manager

LSE

* John Paschoud <j.paschoud@lse.ac.uk>

Programmer

LSE

Simon McLeish <s.mcleish@lse.ac.uk>

(Head of Library Information Services)

LSE

Kate Sloss <k.sloss@lse.ac.uk>

Researcher

UED

Avril Conacher <conachea@srv4.lib.ed.ac.uk>

Programmer

UED

Sandy Shaw <sshaw@ED.AC.UK>

(Learning and Information Services Director)

SBU

John Akeroyd <john.akeroyd@sbu.ac.uk>

(LITC Senior Researcher)

SBU

* Andrew Cox <coxam@sbu.ac.uk>

Researcher

SBU

Nicole Harris <harrisnv@sbu.ac.uk>

(DMU Manager)

DMU

* John Eyre <jle@dmu.ac.uk>

Researcher

DMU

Mark Simpson <mpsimpson@dmu.ac.uk>

Technical Officer

DMU

Jason Ferguson <jferguson@dmu.ac.uk>

Technical Officer

DMU

Ian Bloor < ipb@dmu.ac.uk>

(Technical integration with MIS)

DMU

Alan Glover <aglover@dmu.ac.uk>

(Head of Academic Services & Development)

SHU

Biddy Fisher <b.m.fisher@shu.ac.uk>

(Head of Technical Services and Development)

SHU

Edward Oyston <e.oyston@shu.ac.uk>

(Information Specialist)

SHU

* Alison Ward <a.ward@shu.ac.uk>

(Learning Centre Systems Manager)

SHU

Anne Turner <a.turner@shu.ac.uk>

(Director)

Edina

Peter Burnhill <P.Burnhill@ed.ac.uk>

(Assistant Director)

Edina

* Alison Bayley <A.Bayley@ed.ac.uk>

* = representative on Project Board; "(institutional job titles)" shown in brackets

Involvement with Programme

The second DNER Programme concertation workshop (London, June 2001) was attended by John Paschoud, Avril Conacher, John Eyre and Andrew Cox.

Following discussion with DNER staff and other projects, ANGEL has been re-allocated to the Access to Teaching & Learning Resources cluster. An initial meeting of the cluster Steering Committee has been scheduled for 05-Sep-2001, at Warwick University.

Publications and Publicity

All major publications and presentations by the project are listed and referenced at http://www.angel.ac.uk/dissemination/dissemination.html

Engagement with Potential Outcomes Users

Public website at http://www.angel.ac.uk is now fully designed and populated with all available public information, links and contact details.

Initial Formative Evaluation workpackage (WP2) has made contact with a wide range of potential end-users of ANGEL services at SBU, LSE, DMU, UED, and SHU. In addition, detailed discussions of ‘secondary’ requirements have been held with institutional staff involved in development of local end-user interfaves (MLEs/ITEs), at UED (Edinburgh Student Portal), DMU (MLE Project) and LSE (LSEforYou).

Detailed Progress and Future Plans

Project Plan was submitted to DNER in Feb-2001. No comments have been received on it. Consortium Agreement has been agreed by partner representatives in principle, but is still subject to negotiation arising from consultation with various institutional legal advisers, and is therefore not finalised yet.

Preparatory work has been started on detailed protocols for ISE of systems products.

Future plans and objectives are as shown in the Project Plan, but with a greater proportion of development effort devoted to middleware services development, and consequently a lesser focus on the design of ANGEL-specific end-user interfaces. This should not significantly affect the contents or target dates of any Workpackage 5 or 6 deliverables (as far as they are detailed in the Project Plan), but it may entail a consequent change of focus of summative evaluation activities, from end-users of ANGEL to also include service administrators of institutional MLE/ITE interfaces

Discussions are in progress with Alan Robiette (representing JCAS) regarding the formal participation of one or more ANGEL partners as UK representatives in the (otherwise entirely US-based) pilot of the prototype Shibboleth system, probably commencing in October/November 2001.

Financial Summary Table

Period: Feb-2001 to Jul-2001

This period:

Cumulative for project:

6

months

11

months

Cumulative

JISC budget

Actual

JISC budget

Actual

Variance

Staff costs

£ 67,083

£ 65,226

£ 122,986

£ 95,424

-£ 27,562

Travel & subsistence

£ 4,056

£ 2,966

£ 7,436

£ 4,485

-£ 2,951

Dissemination items

£ 1,660

£ -

£ 3,043

£ -

-£ 3,043

Consumeables & other costs

£ -

£ 795

£ -

£ 913

£ 913

Content licensing

£ -

£ -

£ -

£ -

£ -

Equipment

£ 3,000

£ -

£ 5,500

£ 1,395

-£ 4,105

Total:

£ 75,799

£ 68,987

£ 138,965

£ 102,217

-£ 36,749

Please note that all Actual Expenditure figures shown above are provisional only, and subject to amendment after ratification of year-end totals with institutional finance records (which was not possible within the timescale required by JISC for submission of this report).

Figures shown as "JISC budget" are calculated pro-rata (for the number of months covered by this report) from the total JISC grant for the project over 30 months. We have noted JISC advice that the total budget for capital Equipment of £15,000 should be committed and claimed by the end of the next reporting period (Jan-2002).

The current underspend shown (£36,749) is within planned limits and due to staff posts not expected to be filled from the start of the project, the delayed recruitment to the developer posts at DMU and UED, and other expenditure which is not expected to be spread evenly throughout the course of the project.

Back to top

  pages maintained by Nicole Harris
harrisnv@sbu.ac.uk
page last updated: 7 August, 2001